<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Success and Paris - a powerful paradox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jess.bootc.net/archives/2008/01/13/success-and-paris-a-powerful-paradox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jess.bootc.net/archives/2008/01/13/success-and-paris-a-powerful-paradox/</link>
	<description>Because Everything's Political</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chaz</title>
		<link>http://jess.bootc.net/archives/2008/01/13/success-and-paris-a-powerful-paradox/#comment-6016</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jess.bootc.net/archives/2008/01/13/success-and-paris-a-powerful-paradox/#comment-6016</guid>
		<description>88,189 now. Do you think it may have gone round more than once?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>88,189 now. Do you think it may have gone round more than once?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaz</title>
		<link>http://jess.bootc.net/archives/2008/01/13/success-and-paris-a-powerful-paradox/#comment-6015</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jess.bootc.net/archives/2008/01/13/success-and-paris-a-powerful-paradox/#comment-6015</guid>
		<description>Aha, rapid response, and I know its not all aimed at me. I think the comments on Rayner's flawed article are very interesting, but as you say we have to regard the welfare and local issues as most important. I happen to think it tastes better too, but that is beside the point. Keep banging the welfare drum.
I would mention the soya bean (to feed cattle) and deforestation, but it all makes my head explode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aha, rapid response, and I know its not all aimed at me. I think the comments on Rayner&#8217;s flawed article are very interesting, but as you say we have to regard the welfare and local issues as most important. I happen to think it tastes better too, but that is beside the point. Keep banging the welfare drum.<br />
I would mention the soya bean (to feed cattle) and deforestation, but it all makes my head explode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://jess.bootc.net/archives/2008/01/13/success-and-paris-a-powerful-paradox/#comment-6014</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jess.bootc.net/archives/2008/01/13/success-and-paris-a-powerful-paradox/#comment-6014</guid>
		<description>It wasn't you that comment was aimed at, actually, as I know you are very right on about your meat. Yes, the non-free range eggs in every day items is quite frightening... 

The pinging is annoying, I agree, but for a very good cause :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t you that comment was aimed at, actually, as I know you are very right on about your meat. Yes, the non-free range eggs in every day items is quite frightening&#8230; </p>
<p>The pinging is annoying, I agree, but for a very good cause <img src='http://jess.bootc.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaz</title>
		<link>http://jess.bootc.net/archives/2008/01/13/success-and-paris-a-powerful-paradox/#comment-6013</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jess.bootc.net/archives/2008/01/13/success-and-paris-a-powerful-paradox/#comment-6013</guid>
		<description>Yes, I made that comment about the noise, it makes iTunes and reading  RR at the same time impossible. And I am a little surprised at how few people have signed up, 88,095 as I write this, so perhaps we can't be bothered, or maybe, more likely, he is talking to the converted. But Jay Rayner in Sunday's Observer had some interesting points. 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2239989,00.html
But perhaps what really matters are the missed meal ingredients, the soups with chicken stock, cakes with eggs and other much more obscure products. M&#38;S seem to be taking a good approach, they banned all except Fair Trade coffee and tea in their cafes, but I am not sure how they are getting on with Fair Trade cotton products. It is difficult to know how far one can go. I guess the most important part of the campaign is allotment which as well as its chicken run also has a vegetable patch which will be a more effective improvement to the estate diet that anything that comes out of the chicken process.
But we are talking animal welfare rather than nutrition so… Ah well I am going round and round. Suffice to say its always good to think these things through, and if you can afford to, do it. But can we afford not too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I made that comment about the noise, it makes iTunes and reading  RR at the same time impossible. And I am a little surprised at how few people have signed up, 88,095 as I write this, so perhaps we can&#8217;t be bothered, or maybe, more likely, he is talking to the converted. But Jay Rayner in Sunday&#8217;s Observer had some interesting points.<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2239989,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2239989,00.html</a><br />
But perhaps what really matters are the missed meal ingredients, the soups with chicken stock, cakes with eggs and other much more obscure products. M&amp;S seem to be taking a good approach, they banned all except Fair Trade coffee and tea in their cafes, but I am not sure how they are getting on with Fair Trade cotton products. It is difficult to know how far one can go. I guess the most important part of the campaign is allotment which as well as its chicken run also has a vegetable patch which will be a more effective improvement to the estate diet that anything that comes out of the chicken process.<br />
But we are talking animal welfare rather than nutrition so… Ah well I am going round and round. Suffice to say its always good to think these things through, and if you can afford to, do it. But can we afford not too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
